The status of this evaluation:
Evaluation Process Started - CO
Reporting Period From to
(MM/DD/YYYY) (REQUIRED)
Contracting Office:
Contract Number:
Task Order Number:
Contractor Name: (REQUIRED)
Address:
TIN:
(REQUIRED) DUNS:
(OPTIONAL) SIC:
(OPTIONAL) Commodity Code:
(REQUIRED) Contract Type:
CA - Cost-Plus-Award-Fee
CF - Cost-Plus-Incentive
CP - Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee
CR - Cost - No Fee
CS - Cost-Sharing
FE - Fixed-Price with Economic Price Adjustment
FI - Fixed-Price Incentive
FP - Fixed-Price
FR - Fixed-Price Redeterminable
LH - Labor Hour
OO - Other
TM - Time and Materials
Contract Award Date: (REQUIRED)
Contract Expiration Date: (REQUIRED)
Contract Value:
(REQUIRED)
Description of requirement: (REQUIRED)
Summarize contractor
performance and check
the number which corresponds to the
rating for each category.
(REQUIRED)
Press button below for rating criteria
0 - Nonconformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract
requirements, despite use of Agency
resources
1 - Overall compliance requires major Agency resources to ensure
achievement of contract requirements
2 - Overall compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure
achievement of contract requirements
3 - Overall compliance does not impact achievement of contract
requirements
4 - There are no quality problems
5 - The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance
level that justifies adding a point to
the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in
those rare circumstances where
contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance
levels described as "Excellent".
Government Comments: (REQUIRED) (Read Only. Changes will not be accepted)
(REQUIRED FOR COST TYPE CONTRACTS) (REQUIRED FOR FIXED PRICE CONTRACT)
Press button below for rating criteria
0 - Ability to manage cost issues is jeopardizing performance of
contract requirements, despite use of
Agency resources
1 - Ability to manage cost issues requires major Agency resources
to ensure achievement of contract
requirements
2 - Ability to control cost issues requires minor Agency resources
to ensure achievement of contract
requirements
3 - Management of cost issues does not impact achievement of
contract requirements
4 - There are no cost management issues
5 - The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance
level that justifies adding a point to
the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in
those rare circumstances where
contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance
levels described as "Excellent".
Government Comments:
(REQUIRED FOR COST TYPE CONTRACTS.
OPTIONAL FOR FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS )
(Read Only. Changes will not be accepted)
(REQUIRED)
Press button below for rating criteria
0 - Delays are jeopardizing the achievement of contract
requirements, despite use of Agency resources
1 - Delays require major Agency resources to ensure achievement of
contract requirements
2 - Delays require minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of
contract requirements
3 - Delays do not impact achievement of contract requirements
4 - There are no delays
5 - The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance
level that justifies adding a point to
the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in
those rare circumstances where
contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance
levels described as "Excellent".
Government Comments: (REQUIRED) (Read Only. Changes will not be accepted)
(REQUIRED)
Press button below for rating criteria
0 - Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues
is not effective
1 - Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues
is marginally effective
2 - Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues
is somewhat effective
3 - Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues
is usually effective
4 - Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues
is effective
5 - The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance
level that justifies adding a point to
the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in
those rare circumstances where
contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance
levels described as "Excellent".
Government Comments: (REQUIRED) (Read Only. Changes will not be accepted)
(REQUIRED)
Press button below for rating criteria
0 - Performance was definitely unacceptable with respect to the
objectives for SDB participation in the
award. If not substantially mitigated or corrected, it
should constitute a significant impediment
in considerations for future awards containing similar
requirements/goals.
1 - Performance was significantly less than what is expected of
the contractor, jeopardizing the
objectives for SDB participation in the award. The need
for remedial attention was indicated.
2 - Performance was somewhat less than anticipated achievement to
date, but not so much as to jeopardize
ultimate achievement of the objectives for SDB
participation in the award. Some deficiencies in
meeting reporting requirements may have required
corrective actions.
3 - Performance was fully in line with expectations for the SDB
criterion. No more than minor
deficiencies in reporting requirements have been
experienced.
4 - Performance was substantially above anticipated achievement
levels. Reporting requirements were
fully achieved.
5 - Performance was particularly noteworthy to the extent that it
was significantly in excess of
anticipated achievements and is commendable as an example
for others. It is expected that this
rating will be used in rare circumstances where the
contractor performance exceeds the performance
levels of "excellent".
Government Comments: (REQUIRED) (Read Only. Changes will not be accepted)
SUBCONTRACTS
Are subcontracts involved? (Check one)
(REQUIRED) Government Comments: (Please comment
on those subcontractors
that have provided a significant
contribution to overall
contract performance.)
Contractor's Comments: (Read Only. Changes will not be accepted)
CONTRACTOR MANAGER/PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (last name, first name) :
(REQUIRED) Government Comments: Note: The comment length is
limited to 2000 characters.
Contractor's Comments: (Read Only. Changes will not be accepted)
CONTRACTOR KEY PERSON (last name, first name) : Government Comments: Note: The comment length
is limited to 2000 characters.
Contractor's Comments: (Read Only. Changes will not be accepted)
CONTRACTOR KEY PERSON (last name, first name) : Government Comments: Note: The comment length
is limited to 2000 characters.
Contractor's Comments: (Read Only. Changes will not be accepted)
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
Is/was the contractor committed
to customer satisfaction?
(Check one)
(REQUIRED) If this is the Final Report after contract expiration: (Check one)
(Required on Final Evaluations) Government Comments:
Contractor's Comments: (Read Only. Changes will not be accepted)
USPS
PROJECT OFFICER (last name, first name) :
(REQUIRED) The Following Phone Numbers are Foreign Numbers Phone: ((NNN)NNN-NNNN) (REQUIRED)
Ext: Fax: Internet Address: (REQUIRED)
Date: (MM/DD/YYYY) (REQUIRED)
CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE (last name, first name) :
(REQUIRED) The Following Phone Numbers are Foreign Numbers Phone: ((NNN)NNN-NNNN) (REQUIRED)
Ext: Fax: Internet Address: (REQUIRED)
The following alternate Contractore Representative information is
required to insure that at least one person is notified of evaluation.
ALTERNATE CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE (last name, first name) :
(REQUIRED) The Following Phone Numbers are Foreign Numbers Phone: ((NNN)NNN-NNNN) (REQUIRED)
Ext: Internet Address: (REQUIRED)
Do not Send Evaluation to Contractor yet.
CONTRACTOR UNIQUE ID (7-10 characters)
: (REQUIRED)
Contractor Comments Due Date:
(MM/DD/YYYY) (Required when sending evaluation to Contractor)
Use the plus(+) or minus(-) buttons to increase or decrease the Contractor Comment Due Date
CONTRACTING OFFICER (last name, first name) :
(REQUIRED) The Following Phone Numbers are Foreign Numbers Phone: ((NNN)NNN-NNNN) (REQUIRED)
Ext: Fax: Internet Address: (REQUIRED)
Date: (MM/DD/YYYY) (REQUIRED)
OMB CLEARANCE NO. 9000-0142SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION/CONFIDENTIAL
The status of this evaluation:
Evaluation Process Started - CO
RETURN TO MAIN FORM